Tesla car near an office building under a dramatic sky.

Elon Musk’s $56 Billion Tesla Pay Package Rejected Again

Uncategorized / By

Elon Musk’s efforts to reinstate his controversial $56 billion pay package from Tesla were thwarted once more by a Delaware judge. Chancellor Kathaleen McCormick upheld her previous ruling, stating that the compensation plan was improperly granted and that Musk had undue influence over the board during its approval process.

Key Takeaways

  • Delaware judge reaffirms rejection of Musk’s $56 billion pay package.
  • Judge cites flaws in the approval process and Musk’s control over negotiations.
  • Tesla plans to appeal the ruling despite a shareholder vote in favor of the package.

Background of the Pay Package

In 2018, Tesla’s board approved a performance-based pay package for Musk, which was touted as the largest in U.S. corporate history. The package was structured around 12 milestones tied to Tesla’s growth, with Musk receiving stock options as the company achieved these targets. However, the plan faced scrutiny from shareholders who argued that Musk’s influence compromised the board’s independence.

Court Rulings and Shareholder Votes

In January 2024, Chancellor McCormick ruled that the pay package was excessive and voided it, stating that Musk had effectively controlled the negotiations. Following this, Tesla held a shareholder vote in June 2024, where a significant majority supported reinstating the package. However, McCormick dismissed this vote as insufficient to overturn her earlier decision, emphasizing that a conflicted controller transaction cannot be ratified post-factum.

Legal Arguments and Judge’s Opinion

Musk’s legal team argued that the shareholder vote demonstrated support for the pay package, but McCormick found their arguments lacking. She pointed out several fatal flaws in their reasoning, including:

  1. Procedural Grounds: The defense failed to establish a basis for revising the court’s earlier ruling.
  2. Material Misstatements: The judge noted that the proxy statement contained significant inaccuracies that undermined the validity of the shareholder vote.
  3. Control Issues: Musk’s role as a controlling shareholder raised questions about the independence of the board during the pay package’s approval.

Financial Implications

As part of the ruling, the court ordered Tesla to pay $345 million in attorney fees to the plaintiff’s lawyers, a fraction of the $5.6 billion they initially sought. This fee is one of the largest awarded in securities litigation, reflecting the significant legal battle surrounding Musk’s compensation.

Future Outlook

Despite the legal setbacks, Musk’s wealth has surged, with his net worth increasing significantly in recent weeks. Tesla’s stock has seen a notable rise, attributed to investor optimism following the recent U.S. presidential election. Musk’s legal team plans to appeal the ruling to the Delaware Supreme Court, which could prolong the legal saga surrounding his compensation package.

In conclusion, the ongoing legal battles over Musk’s pay package highlight the complexities of executive compensation and corporate governance, particularly in companies where founders maintain significant control. As Tesla navigates this turbulent landscape, the implications for shareholders and the broader market remain to be seen.

Sources